Which of the following is NOT a consideration when calculating the Stretch Provision?

When calculating the Stretch Provision in the context of player contracts, one essential aspect to note is that the Stretch Provision is primarily concerned with the financial structure of a contract rather than a player's individual performance metrics. The Stretch Provision allows teams to spread out the cap hit of a player they want to waive or reduce the salary cap impact of a player contract over multiple years.

The length of the contract is a key factor because the total amount owed to the player is divided by the number of years remaining on the contract, determining how the cap hit is managed over time. Similarly, the minimum salary for the current contract is relevant since it sets the baseline for calculations related to the player's cap number. Finally, the number of additional years also plays a significant role because it helps in determining the total duration over which the contract can be stretched.

In contrast, the player's performance history does not factor into the calculation of the Stretch Provision. While a player's performance might influence contract negotiations or future contracts, it does not impact how a current contract’s payments are structured in the context of the Stretch Provision. Thus, the performance history is not a consideration for calculating the Stretch Provision, highlighting why this option stands out in the given question.